Web traffic is a delayed signal - your site is already broken

It's always a mistake to track web performance based on traffic alone. It's perfectly possible to have high traffic, whilst suffering huge difficulties elsewhere, eg high cost, risky practices, etc.

Instead, you should measure performance across 3 broad categories:
  1. Online indicators
  2. Operational indicators
  3. Organisational indicators
Together they give you a much better idea of overall performance.

For example, online indicators measure your ability to meet the minimum expectations of your target web audience. Such indicators include:
  • Responsiveness - Does the site load quickly & consistently?
  • Content  - Is text relevant, readable, understandable & actionable?
  • Accessibility - How well can the site be used by people with disabilities?
  • Portability - How well can it be used on different devices (mobile, tablet, etc)?
  • Usability - Can it be used effectively with minimum effort/errors?
  • And many more...
On many sites, few (if any) of these indicators are tracked. Only when email complaints go up & traffic goes down, do they realise something is wrong.

That's why relying solely on web traffic or feedback for assessing online performance is such a bad idea. They are delayed signals. The site is already broken.

Happily, plenty of automated tools are available (a few of which we have) to keep an eye on things. These tools provide the immediate insight needed to maintain stability & intervene before web users start to rebel.

Web content in the age of anxiety

"Nothing distorts intent like anxiety. Anxiety pulls focus from the goal and lets energy flow towards distractions and perceived threats. Anxiety flourishes in the absence of information." 
Muledesign.com

Anxiety is one of the key hidden drivers behind the web.

Our anxiety (fear of legal challenges, negative media coverage, etc) can make our content cagey, vague and stand-offish.

Our users' anxiety (lack of time, fear of undelivered products, credit card theft, etc) can make their engagements tense, their correspondence angry and their reactions dramatic.

We end up exacerbating each other.

But anxiety falls when the right content is delivered with care. Self-assurance from us gives confidence to our users.

"These guys communicate so clearly & are so precise, they are obviously on top of things."

That doesn't mean we say anything & everything online. In fact, it means the opposite. It means we need to be exactly clear about what we say & how we say it - so it can be best understood.

That's what content strategy is for, ie to:

  1. Isolate the right information to deliver via web. (What messages are core? What’s secondary?)
  2. Determine the right depth & breadth of content to publish. (How much is too much? How much is too little? How much is just right?)
  3. Identify the right features & formats for our purposes. (Plain text? Interactive tools? Video? Downloads?)
  4. Produce it in the right way, so it is findable, readable & understandable. (Plain English? White space? Short paragraphs?)
  5. Craft it in the right way, so it is persuasive & actionable. (Compel people to act? Dissuade ineligible applicants?)
  6. Manage it after golive so it remains uptodate and accurate. (Measurement? Lifecycle?)

It's not easy and it takes time.

But for service organisations (eg government, utilities, etc)the pay-off in reduced anxiety (& calls, emails, visits, phonecalls) is well worth it.